That's cool but by only supporting Claude Code you are contributing to the Anthropic lock-in problem.

This needs to support at least Gemini CLI, Codex and OpenCode as well, preferably by being generic as much as possible.

obmelvin2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
It isn't ones duty to develop for everybody. If someone makes something for their own use case and shares it, that's fine.
godelski2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743785
And that's the beauty of open source and code. You can share it freely and easily. There's no thing that can be made for everyone.

Maybe some irony is everyone tells me they "just care that it works". Yet it can work and you'll always have the comments like above because it works for the reason it was made but not for things it wasn't made for. But it's open, so modify the code and put in what you want ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I guess I should clarify its source available, not "Open Source". There's no license on the project so it's default theirs. But no harm if you're just editing it yourself. @OP should put up some license to let others know how what is allowed and what isn't

harthor1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743948
Agree on the source-available clarification — this exact distinction matters on HN and I learned it the hard way recently.

I just went through the licensing decision for my own project and landed on BSL 1.1 with a 4-year conversion to Apache 2.0. Framing it as "source-available, auto-converts to Apache 2.0 in 2030" reads as transparent intent rather than "fake open source."

That said, BSL/FSL really only make sense if you plan to monetize a hosted version yourself. For wrapper tools like Claudraband that sit on top of an existing product ecosystem, MIT or Apache 2.0 might fit better — you're not protecting a competing SaaS, you're just sharing code.

halfwhey1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743948
MIT License added
halfwhey2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
Codex and Gemini have ACP servers already:

https://github.com/zed-industries/codex-acp https://geminicli.com/docs/cli/acp-mode/

In fact Codex, in OpenAI fashion, have their own protocol as well:

https://developers.openai.com/codex/app-server

Opencode too. These tools are already so programmable and embeddable, it's just Claude Code is a sticking point. But maybe it would be useful to provide a unified CLI and Daemon for all of them.

lifis2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743693
They have ACP servers but they might apply different rate limits or policies if they notice ACP use, while a solution like yours would not trigger that unless it becomes popular enough to specifically detect. It also seems this provides more features them just an ACP server.
halfwhey2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743859
That's a good point, I'll look into tackling this soon
stingraycharles1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743859
> they might apply different rate limits or policies if they notice ACP use

Is there any evidence that supports this claim?

BoorishBears1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743859
Is there an example of this?
behrlich1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
https://github.com/ehrlich-b/wingthing - Here's my version of this idea which is agent agnostic. Not exactly the same idea, "sandbox'ed persistent agent", in my case available over the web with xterm.js (though you can also just run locally).
snthpy14 hours ago | | | parent | | on: 47745825
This looks very cool! My concern is just that it's a lot of things bundled in one and I kind of have to trust you for all of them. I would prefer something that puts together a stack of better known components, like a docker compose of agent-sandbox and tailscale or something equivalent, etc ... ideally with each of those swappable.
snthpy14 hours ago | | | parent | | on: 47745825
Looks cool! What's a roost? Is that just a name for the server to go with the whole egg analogy some technology that I haven't heard of before?
d4v31 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
Can't you just tell your AI tool of choice to just port it? One thing I like about AI is that now I can easily roll my own or take an open-source project and customize it really fast with very little commitment on my end. Instead of everyone having to use the exact same tools, now we can customize it to our liking--at least for now
ay2 days ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
I’ve made something very similar that is almost backend-agnostic: https://github.com/ayourtch-llm/tttt - and it does auto inject the MCP in case of Claude, but it is trivial to adapt to other backends.
StevenThompson1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47744613
This is really cool.

I did something similar with gemini cli by just wrapping it in tmux and building some extensions.[0]

Eventually that wasnt enough so I ended up forking it and adding REST endpoints to inject commands and read the screen.[1]

Your solution is much cleaner! I'll probably replace mine with it. Thanks for sharing!

[0] https://github.com/stevenAthompson/self-command

[1] https://github.com/stevenAthompson/gemini-cli-remote-control

sunir1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
For someone paying nothing for something that costs nothing, you have way more than nothing to complain about. Not appropriate.
keyle1 day ago | | | parent | | on: 47743616
Opencode already supports continuing old sessions with ctrl-x, l.